Thursday, August 13, 2009

Good Question

My good friend Aaron Hart posed this question to several of us via facebook. I thought I'd copy it in here along with my answer:

AH: Hey guys, I know we can't all spend time in the Word together but I enjoy learning from you and interacting with you in pursuit of the truth, hence this message. Romans 5:9-11, I read it recently and was struck with the thought that Paul makes notable separation between reconciliation and salvation. Is this so?

MC:First, I think Joey is just about right when it comes to the definition of reconciliation. I would say that reconciliation most literally means to bring together, or make peace between, two estranged or hostile parties (1Cor. 7:11).

Secondly, in order to properly understand this passage we have to see its structure. One important aspect of the structure to notice is that verses 9-11 are the conclusion and summation of verses 1-8. Another, perhaps more important, structural element to notice is that verses 9 & 10 are parallels that make the same point.

Thirdly, we must define the terms of the passage accurately. Justification (not salvation) is the legal term in this paragraph. Justification refers to the believer being declared innocent by the judge. Reconciliation refers to the believer being brought into joyous communion or friendship with that same judge. Salvation or being saved in this passage refers to being saved from the wrath to come on the day of the Lord at the end of time.

Conclusion:

I think that Paul is trying to encourage the believers at Rome that if through faith in Christ and his shed blood on the cross they are both declared not guilty and reconciled in friendship to God, then they can be certain that they will rise, just as Christ did, to life on the last day and not judgment. Justification and reconciliation are present realities and salvation is a future one that is already accomplished. 

Praise God!

Sources:

Thomas R. Schreiner - Romans (Baker Exegetical Commentary)
Douglas J. Moo - Romans (NICNT)

No comments: